Shoreline Conservation Collaborative
The Shoreline Conservation Collaborative is a coalition of fourteen groups, including the North Olympic Land Trust of Clallam County and the Jefferson Land Trust of Jefferson County. The goal of this organization is to permanently protect 150 shoreline properties and restore an additional 30 shoreline areas during the next decade. This coalition was created by Hannah Clark, who said:
“Our members saw a significant opportunity to work together to protect Puget Sound. The shoreline of Puget Sound may look pristine and accessible, but is neither. This unique and irreplaceable natural treasure has been in decline for years, with thousands of acres altered, contaminated or destroyed, and less than 12 percent open to the public to enjoy.”
Erik Kingfisher, president of Washington Association of Land Trusts and stewardship director of Jefferson Land Trust, said:
“By having a collaborative, this community of organizations working together on the shoreline, it helps us to bring in the context of a regional significance. We all love to spend time on our wild and undeveloped beaches — it’s part of what makes this such an amazing place to live. The shorelines are also magnets for development, and there are some shorelines that are simply more important for people, wildlife and clean water than they are as potential development properties. All of the projects we’ll be working on are arranged voluntarily. We work with willing landowners on a voluntary basis to acquire and/or restore properties.”
“Our members saw a significant opportunity to work together to protect Puget Sound. The shoreline of Puget Sound may look pristine and accessible, but is neither. This unique and irreplaceable natural treasure has been in decline for years, with thousands of acres altered, contaminated or destroyed, and less than 12 percent open to the public to enjoy.”
Erik Kingfisher, president of Washington Association of Land Trusts and stewardship director of Jefferson Land Trust, said:
“By having a collaborative, this community of organizations working together on the shoreline, it helps us to bring in the context of a regional significance. We all love to spend time on our wild and undeveloped beaches — it’s part of what makes this such an amazing place to live. The shorelines are also magnets for development, and there are some shorelines that are simply more important for people, wildlife and clean water than they are as potential development properties. All of the projects we’ll be working on are arranged voluntarily. We work with willing landowners on a voluntary basis to acquire and/or restore properties.”
7 Comments:
So, is this going to be opposed by the same people who opposed "Wild Olympics"? Remember, that was also an effort that allowed WILLING land owners to donate their land for future generations to enjoy.
But, the really, really smart people in Clallam that support "Property Rights" rushed to oppose that. They are SO smart that they couldn't see the contradictions in their views.
Yeah, a landowner should have unfettered rights to do what ever they want with THEIR land, except for when they want to do things the Property Rights folks don't approve of. Like give it for parks.
Or, growing legal cannabis on agriculturally zoned lands.
Well, it is against the law to shoot real estate agents.
We see that the group of real estate folks have filed a lawsuit to stop efforts to protect the Dungeness River. You know, that their rights to develop their property is far more important than worrying those silly fish having any water left to swim and spawn in.
"Property Rights" folks are the most selfish people I've seen.
Stealing public resources for private gain is a strong motivator for the "property rights" flag-wavers.
For example, the few shorelines that should remain open to the public in Washington are often closed off by selfish neighbors who try to claim that the beaches belong only to them.
Has Clallam County ever opened and enforced the public road end where Wilcox Lane meets the Strait? I recall that about 15 years ago the Road Department actually got brave enough to remove the illegal barriers placed there by neighbors who wanted to keep the public from accessing the beach. But the Commissioners were deluged with whining neighbors who wanted to continue to keep people out.
Why won't "property rights" extremists ever defend the collective rights to public property that belong to all of us? Such as public water that flows in rivers and underground aquifers?
A link, thought of you BBC...
http://tinyhousetalk.com/documentary-willy-wonka-reclaimed-tiny-housing/
@ 5:56 AM....
I made a tiny house last summer, took it to Texas with me. I'll take it there again in June when I start moving there.
HERE IS A PICTURE OF IT IN TEXAS...
No freaking way!!! Thanks for the picture! Looks very nice.
Post a Comment
<< Home